Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirill Vladimirovich Fandeyev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The consensus is that Fandeyev does not meet the criteria for inclusion on the English Wikipedia --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Kirill Vladimirovich Fandeyev

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

1.The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors. - No, he isn't.

2.The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. - No, he isn't.

3.The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. - No, he isn't.

4.The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. - No, he isn't. --Oldfox2003 (talk) 20:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - Already a significant body of work. No need to blow away this biography. Carrite (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * But the article doesn't satisfy WP:BIO criteria.--Oldfox2003 (talk) 21:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The fact that much work was put into this article is irrelevant. See WP:ATA RadManCF &#x2622; open frequency 22:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Article seems to be a thinly veiled resume for a person who clearly doesn't meet our criteria for inclusion. RadManCF &#x2622; open frequency 22:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - Persona is a finalist in the All-Russian competition of the prestigious international festival and a member of the Composers' Union —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.254.43.62 (talk) 21:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This composer's union is non-goverment organisation, and anybody, who have higher music education may become a member of this union. All-Russian competion is anonymous competition, anybody, even me and you may participate in it. There isn't any preselection. Moreover, only a finalist, first-seccond-third places were not conquered by him.--Oldfox2003 (talk) 04:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * And there is no any mentioning of really prestigious and international festival--Oldfox2003 (talk) 11:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * User OldFox no significant contribution to the en.wikipedia, but he put on the removal of the article. Please consider the fact that the party does not have a particularly significant contribution to the encyclopedia. In addition, the user repeatedly violated the rules on ru.wikipedia many times and warned there administrators --Spanya (talk) 21:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Users Spanya & Kusiel are clones of user Spaniel and they all banned in ruwiki for trolling, violating the rules, copyright violation, threats of prosecution and many others deeds. You can see decision of checkuser here & here. This artical is written by himself and posted in different languages. Very likely that all this anonimous users are Spanya.--Oldfox2003 (talk) 04:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Written as a user is not true. User kusiel - this is a completely different person. You can check this by placing accounts on test in Ukrainian wiki. Any verification to confirm that this different computers and even different cities. Written user OldFox is slander - Article on ruviki was not created by the composer. This can be seen in the history of changes.
 * User OldFox on Russian wiki disclosing confidential information to another user, but was not punished for no apparent reason. Note: Deleting article relates only to the user's personal hostility to the composer.
 * Repeated violation of the rights of users OldFox can be found here

Аs this user changes the reference to the breach, that it was impossible to verify them. So do not be surprised if by clicking on the disclosure of confidential information, you will be just on its talk page. Proof that the user is editing an encyclopedia without a trace, was obtained from him in private correspondence. --Spanya (talk) 16:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * As usual (so this user deed at ruwiki), Spanya/Spaniel/Kusiel/Kysa (they are/he is the author of the article in different language sections of WP. Yes, ten to one, person Kusiel exist IRL, but by ruwiki userchecker's approved that Spaniel/Spanya used his/her account in discussions and article's editing also) starts to flame, discussing users but not article, ignors decisions of checkusers, starts to blame without any base other users in attempt to save article about himself. I was not blocked after publishing his letter because it contained threats and user acknowledged this and agreed with it publication. He, as usual, baseless blames me (& other users) in different deeds (but "changes the reference" it's something new), and in such impossible thing, like traceless editing of wikipedia (!). He accused me in this action at ruwiki also, even after he was explained that it happend because he used "go back" in browser without updating the page...--Oldfox2003 (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * You are now passed to the person and left of the subject article. Allegations of identity accounts baseless. I have already wrote above. And once again emphasize that it can verify the administrator at the Ukrainian wiki with the relevant rights. This proves that the entrance to the account was from different cities. A user continues his accusations. I propose to put a warning for the transition to the individual. --Spanya (talk) 17:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * As I said. I want to appologize for him, and the fact that He started unacceptably discussion.--Oldfox2003 (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - The composer is in the union composers. He participated in the considerable competition Petrov's name. I think, it is enough.--212.2.138.40 (talk) 22:27, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not enough to satisfy WP:BIO criteria.--Oldfox2003 (talk) 04:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete unless better evidence is produced. A fair sized body of work - but is it notable? Has it been performed or recorded - and if so where? The 'diploma' awarded in the St Petersburg конкурс (literally 'concours' but probably = competition) - what is the standing of this? Is there academic status giving notability? Being in a composers' union is not evidence of notability so far as I can see. Peridon (talk) 21:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.