Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Kirkpatrick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 04:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Kirk Kirkpatrick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

At first glance, it looked like there was coverage, but most of the sources are mere mentions of the person or confirmation that he belongs to a group etc. In the end, it's a puff piece without significant coverage of the subject by reliable third-party sources. Would not oppose a redirect to his company article per WP:BUSINESSPERSONOUTCOME Niteshift36 (talk) 17:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 17:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 17:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 17:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 17:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018!  (distænt write)  17:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

His organization is still in the news. Has this not already been discussed? 76.109.23.49 (talk) 18:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC) — 76.109.23.49 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * 1) No, there hasn't been an AfD discussion. 2) The notability of his company isn't the subject of discussion. This is about the notability of the individual. Being the CEO of a notable company doesn't give you a free pass to notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete or redirect. No evidence of significant coverage in independent sources. Most of the sources aren't independent at all. I do not believe that the Who's Who entries are evidence of notability, as I believe these particular publications include all senior executives of all companies over a certain size. The Marquis Who's Who, in particular, allows subjects to submit their own biographies and boasts of having over 1.5M biographies. Pburka (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UNOPPOSED.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.