Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Lombard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No indication that this meets wp:bio. Keep arguments rely on an assumption that the band is notable. Although there may be enough coverage to support an article about the band, just, there is no independent coverage of Lombard in particular. Flowerparty ☀ 08:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Kirk Lombard

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete so he has caught the largest of a species of fish - does each such recordholder get a page here; what about the growers of the biggest tomato, squash, etc... Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  06:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The fact that he was founder of an apparently-notable band (see two reviews in reliable sources linked at the bottom of the article) is probably more relevant than the fish. JulesH (talk) 10:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable for his role in the band, rather than for catching the fish. If we had an article on his band (we don't, but it could be a good project for someone), it might be a decent merge target, but as it is I think the article ought to stay for now.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per substantial coverage. COuld also be merged if necessary?ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete 2 articles about the band he's in does not impart notability to him. If the band had its own article on Wikipedia, his name would be redirected to the band's article. Since there isn't an article on the band, this should just go away. TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: no stand alone notability, no band article, transient coverage of an event, non-notable artist. JamesBurns (talk) 01:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.