Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Sanford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Kirk Sanford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable CEO of a company that has no Wiki article and searches here, here, here and here found nothing significant and notable and I would've suggested moving to the company's article if one existed thus this is better deleted. At best, the only good thing in this article is the Business Week "Top 100 Most Influential CEOS" but that's not going to save the article. This has never been significantly improved aside from multiple edits by an IP in September 2010 adding "prank calls" and later a mass edit of that; frankly there are no signs of improvement for this article. SwisterTwister  talk  04:59, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom —Мандичка YO 😜 09:51, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment According to this, Sanford did not retire at 40, as stated in this article, but went on to found another company and then sued his former company (the one in this article). The suit was dismissed . The problem I see is that it will take some research and editing to turn this into an up-to-date, accurate BLP -- I have no idea where he is working today, for example. For sure this is a BLP that is inaccurate at this moment in time. LaMona (talk) 01:20, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Since no one has rushed in to defend or update the article, I'll !vote delete. LaMona (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 21:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.