Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirkyan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 00:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Kirkyan
What on earth is this? A self-confessed neologism being a variant of another neologism. Reads like nonsense - original research at best. -- RHaworth 06:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. —porges(talk) 06:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense neologism.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 07:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism, complete nonsense. J I P  | Talk 07:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - psychotic rant, hoax, or original research - Richardcavell 09:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - utter drivel -- Dunstan  talk  11:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete reads like nonsense, only "sources" are blogs. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  11:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. PJM 12:04, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Sorry Guy 15:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Dunstan --Deville (Talk) 23:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as it adds insight to Spimes (which is needed). 'kdevans'


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.