Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirrily White


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 19:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Kirrily White

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Actress who doesn't seem to have played any significant/major roles. Main claim to notability appears to be her appearances in All Saints, but according to IMDB she only appeared in 16 episodes in 2 years and is listed well down the cast. The sources cited in the article do not constitute significant coverage, and none was found elsewhere. Michig (talk) 07:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: her role in All Saints was fairly major (I'd think it was more than 16 episodes), online coverage of that era is sketchy as most Aust newspapers have archived most of their articles from the late 90s/2000s. The-Pope (talk) 04:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, ref says she appeared in over 100 episodes of All Saints. Also I had go at using trove nla, rather than google, to find some info and I found a fair bit of stuff, which I have now added to the article, including info on her early life and the other guest roles that she's had and it has all been referenced. Take a look and see if it should now be kept. Jenks24 (talk) 05:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I still don't see any significant coverage other than the 'seven network' one which doesn't look particularly reliable.--Michig (talk) 07:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree the other refs don't show significant coverage (they just provide some extra info), but I would argue that the Seven Network ref does provide significant coverage and is reliable. Jenks24 (talk) 13:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.