Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kisan Dhage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G10 by Fastily. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Kisan Dhage

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This supposed biographical article is simply a coatrack for allegations against President of India Pratibha Patil and her husband, and fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. See also G. N. Patil and Know Pratibha Patil, which too were created during the contentious nomination of Patil for presidency, and which I have nominated for deletion too. Abecedare (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication that the subject is notable per WP:BIO. Valid news material, but Wikipedia is not news. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 21:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- Abecedare (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- Abecedare (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Abecedare (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject certainly does not pass WP:BIO (at best a WP:BIO1E case), plus obvious WP:BLP problems here. The article reads like an attack page. Nsk92 (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails BIO, do we really have to wait 7 days to get rid of this crap? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this misuse of Wikipedia. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.