Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kishorchak Banamali High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Kishorchak Banamali High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, it probably doesn't even have affiliation to any school board. Also, from what I decipher, the school does not have Class 11 & Class 12. — fr&thinsp;+  11:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep -- It's a secondary school. It exists.  Therefore keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment--FR, the first entry at Pg.95 of this document indicates that it's affiliated to WBBSE. And, your nomination rationale is thus voided in entirety. &#x222F; WBG converse 16:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I would explicitly call for a delete due to a complete failure to meet GNG, (in the loosest of interpretations) but I fully expect that the School Brigade will appear to claim that they are more certain than native speakers of available sourcing (which is just not accessible.....) and hence keep this, as happens to all schools........ &#x222F; WBG converse 16:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.160.216.52 (talk)


 * I still believe that the subject of the article in question is non-notable mainly due to the chronic unavailability of reliable third party sourcing. Additionally, I have struck the misleading portion of my rationale. — fr&thinsp;+  14:11, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:GNG. We simply don't have enough source material for an article about this subject. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:46, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - clear failure of WP:GNG Spiderone  12:17, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough reliable sources to show notability. It is not clear if this is truly equivalent of a high school, or more of a middle school. I think we need to take a reasonable global view and realize that not every secondary school in the whole world is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.