Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kishore Marathe (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 20:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Kishore Marathe

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

This is the home page of the Prof. Marathe. I see no extraordinary contribution of the person in the field of differential geometry and mathematical physics (no offence!). A list of published papers doesn't entitle one to have a wiki page. In fact, I was wrong in the first place to have placed a deletion nomination under WP:BLP1E.. I just cannot find the 1E!! I would still stand by WP:NPF. Rockoprem (talk) 14:35, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as article fails notability criteria for academics. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  14:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Citability is low (both in GoogleScholar and in MathSciNet), h-index in low single digits. No significant awards, journal editorships or anything else to indicate passing WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 18:55, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ditto for WoS, which seems to get his complete publication list back to 1972: h-index is only 2. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 21:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete. Google scholar shows 64 cites for "Mathematical Foundations of Gauge Theories", a reasonable number, but not enough to pass WP:PROF in the absence of anything else. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. GS cites are 64, 7, 6, 4, 3, 2.... Not enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:40, 26 August 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.