Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss & Tail: The Hollywood Jumpoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 19:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Kiss & Tail: The Hollywood Jumpoff

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article was created via a paid-editing project on elance.com. The subject is nonnotable, as it hasn't received significant coverage in reliable, third party sources, or any major reviews or a wide theatrical release.

See also Articles for deletion/Letter to the President, Articles for deletion/Bloody Island (documentary), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings of the Underground: The Dramatic Journey of UGK, and Articles for deletion/Thomas Gibson (film director) for other articles created from this bid. Them From  Space  15:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep if notability can be established The motivation of the article's creation should not be a reason to delete, if WP is an "encyclopedia anyone can edit." Kitfoxxe (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Notability has not yet been established as the film hasn't been covered in-depth by reliable sources. Also, WP:PROMOTION is written into WP:NOT and violations of that policy are grounds for article deletion.  Them From  Space  19:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * What WP:NOT also advises is if when seeming promotional, "the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other". So if article format or seeming promotion of a notable topic can be addressed through regular editing, THAT is what policy suggests as preferable to outright deletion, as both policy and guideline offer options other than the trash bin. I'll apply some google-foo before coming back here.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - quick search reveals no significant coverage by reliable sources that would make this documentary pass WP:NFILM. So regardless of whether it was a paid job/promotional attempt, this movie does not appear to pass the notability guidelines.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 02:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I just gave the article a sandblasting for POV. After diligent searches, I could not find enough to satisfy me that this one meets WP:NF.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.