Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss (South Korean group)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn by nominator after sources added by User:SKS2K6. (Non-admin closure) Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Kiss (South Korean group)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I can't find sufficient RS refs support notability, though I welcome others to point us to them if they exist. Epeefleche (talk) 04:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: The group's a Korean one-hit wonder from 10 years ago. Google News barely helped, so I had to do a precise (regular) search to get any sources.  The references should now suffice, especially considering the length of the article. SKS (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It looks to me as though four of the sources are not RSs for notability purposes, but you may be better able to address that than I am -- am I missing something?  Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, with references improved greatly by SKS. WP:NOENG allows us to use foreign-language sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree that we may use the Korean sources, and that SKS did a great job. I have the above question as to the RS sourcing, but if consensus here is that we have sufficient RS coverage, then it should be kept.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Shame I can't read Korean and help with the sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per the sources added by SKS. Rlendog (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep It looks like enough sources have been added, and they seem to be reliable. Qrsdogg (talk) 01:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Withdraw. Consensus here is that with the Korean sources helpfully uncovered and added by SKS, we now have sufficient indicia of notability, so I am happy to withdraw the nom.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.