Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss All the Boys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Kiss All the Boys

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was created by a representative of Aurora Publishing as a form of promotion. The work has received almost no coverage from reliable third-party sources and only received one review that WP:ANIME can find. However, that one review does not meet the significant coverage test of WP:NOTE. See WT:ANIME for more details about the Wikiproject's Aurora Publishing review. Farix (Talk) 12:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Too dubious, not enough third party coverage, Fail the notability. No licensor in France, Germany, Spain & Italy (Save you time :p )--KrebMarkt 13:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete with only one review and no other coverage beyond Aurora's own promo stuff, fails WP:BK. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not enough coverage to meet WP:BK, and as author also doesn't seem to be notable there's no merge target. (And was I going to AfD it myself today, honest.) —Quasirandom (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 22:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 20:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep By spending just a few seconds Googling the name of the manga and the writer, I found a notable review site giving a detailed review about it. I added that as a reference. Dream Focus (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Blogs and other self-published sources do not demonstrate notability. --Farix (Talk) 21:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ditto...that is not a reliable source and the link has been removed. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 22:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.