Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss It Better (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 21:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Kiss It Better (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Weird disambiguation page, one with an article, the second is just a song, and Kiss It Better already does this work with the hat note. Per WP:TWODABS Harry's song is the WP:Primarytopic. Unless Rihanna's reach a notable status, there is no need for this kind of pages, and I'm quite sure Kiss It Better would be moved to become a disambiguation page if Rihanna's song is notable. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 21:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Just redirect to Kiss It Better, which is an article about a song. If an article is created for Rihanna's song (which is very likely), then we can have Kiss It Better (Debbie Harry song) and Kiss It Better (Rihanna song). Kiss It Better would then become a disambiguation page, to which we could redirect Kiss It Better (song). --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:28, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Update: I agree that the page does not need to function as a disambiguation page... yet... I went ahead and redirected to Kiss It Better, which means this conversation is now more like a "redirects for deletion/discussion" conversation. I think the page's current use as a redirect is constructive, and since it serves a purpose (and can be further repurposed later), I think it should be kept. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That's what I did, I mean. If there were more songs, you'd have a point. I'm closing this as there is no article now. ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 21:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Responding after closure: Sorry for any confusion. Not sure what I was thinking at the time. This solution is great. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)