Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss of a Siren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Kiss of a Siren

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A short film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, as its only claim to notability in the article is winning an award at a minor film festival. Searching for sources turned up a lot of PR pieces or listings in film databases, but I could not find any actual reviews from reliable sources, or non-PR coverage that was more than a brief mention. Neither the creator of the film nor the company that produced it are notable themselves, so there is no valid target I could find for a potential merge. I am bringing it to AFD rather than simply WP:PRODing it, in case anyone else is able to have better luck than I in finding some actual non-PR coverage of it. Rorshacma (talk) 16:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Fashion. Rorshacma (talk) 16:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * comment I found this, which confirms the awards and should count towards notability. Not really enough on its own though. Artw (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - I think that is actually just a repost of an official description/press release rather than a piece of genuine coverage - the exact same text appears on multiple other sites as well. Rorshacma (talk) 16:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.