Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss timeline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Let me know if you want to pick through for mergeable content. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Kiss timeline

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic timeline with no references. RucasHost 01:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Over comprehensive, and unencyclopedic. Important dates are on the Kiss (band) page, so this one is also redundant. J- ſtan TalkContribs 02:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Every event, every action is going to be listed here? What's the point?  Too much trivia.  Perakhantu 17:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge Although the author is clearly one of those Kids in Service to someone rather than a professional writer, this appears to be a valid chronology of the concert tours, album releases, personnel changes, etc. for a very notable rock band. Valid concept for an article, problems with form can be cleaned up if that's actually necessary.  Mandsford 01:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I disagree. Every tiny event in the history of the band is irrelevent. It is going to be an unusual circumstance for the history section of an article to have to be broken away from the main article, due to length, but formatting it like this and including such trivial dates is just unneeded. Some information may want to be merged back into the main article, but certainly not much of it. J Milburn 18:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That is, merging some info would be nice, if someone wanted to source it. J Milburn 18:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.