Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kissa Sins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems like the award(s) in question don't satisfy the PORNBIO requirements and other coverage does not meet GNG. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Kissa Sins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Porn star that fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. Award win is minor. Sources are republished press releases. No non-trivial independent reliable source coverage found in search. PROD contested by article's creator. • Gene93k (talk) 11:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nom is too kind to this article. NN award for best body part clearly fails PORNBIO standards. All references are primary sources or warmed-over press releases. PROD removed by article creator, an SPA, with the edit summary "Fixed Typo" . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk • contribs) 11:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as only minor award so does not pass Pornbio and lack of reliable source references so does not pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete nominated for a few AVN Awards in the industry however her lack of mainstream coverage fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. --   LuK3      (Talk)   16:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; the article exists to promote the subject's business. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks any claim to notability; Inked award too obscure. -- fdewaele, 11 September 2016, 11:37 CET.
 * Keep, Clearly meets PORNBIO and GNG ... Ofcourse yet again this has nothing to do with wp:HOTTIE and ofcourse I don't expect this comment to be ignored in its entirety. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Available industry produced coverage is of no value per WP:NRV. No independent reliable sources cover this topic, fails GNG and stringent BLP criteria. Fails PORNBIO. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable bornographic actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.