Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kita Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Kita Records

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject is non notable, poorly written and has only one source. The article and the source added does not show how the record label meets GNG.  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  12:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  Comr Melody Idoghor   (talk)  12:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nominator has not advanced any reasoning as to why they think "Subject is non notable". Current quality of writing and sourcing are not grounds for deletion. The subject was active thirty years ago, so most sources that cover it will not be found online. That said, these academic theses clearly establish that it was one of the Thailand's four largest record labels at the time. Mentioned in this book chapter (though I don't have access). Its decline is mentioned in this Billboard article from 1998. Plenty of Thai web articles about its former artists and TV news scoops about its reunion concerts. PS This thesis covers the subject's business within the industry in considerable depth. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC), 21:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Was once one of the big 3 of Thai music label. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 00:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.