Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitchen Whore Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. It doesn't matter if the company has notable artists, it needs to meet WP:GNG on its own. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 13:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Kitchen Whore Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Company does not appear to meet notability standards. It lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Currently unsourced. No sources found that provided any depth of coverage, only trivial mentions. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - There appears to be insufficient reliable coverage to warrant an article at this time. —  C M B J   11:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:N --HighKing (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability. Google search didn't turn up significant independent coverage or sources.  Idk224 (talk) 22:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's just a stub file and it is referenced from other artists on Wikipedia. — Prodoom (talk) 16:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Label has notable artists. Beefalo (talk) 21:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.