Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kite (.hack)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of .hack characters. ✗ plicit  13:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Kite (.hack)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Like Ovan, despite being sourced and well written. This article is also mostly build up with trivia articles/sources like passing mentions from games reviews. It has zero WP:SIGCOV. Greenish Pickle!  (🔔) 11:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of .hack characters. Trivial mentions and trivial mentions, there needs to be more grist to justify a standalone page. Right now there isn't evidence that Kite is standalaone notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. The problem, as often, is that this is a very well researched article that is built on zero sources meeting WP:SIGCOV. Dozens of mentions in passing are not sufficient for a topic to have stand-alone article on Wikipedia, unfortunately. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:53, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per Zxcvbnm. WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs aren't enough to pass WP:SIGCOV, or support a stand alone article. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.