Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitengela Mixed Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Kitengela Mixed Secondary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm very permissive about secondary schools, but there is not enough information here, and no third party refs  DGG ( talk ) 01:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete we need something more than an organizations own website to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Irrelevant and just another serial delete vote. The school does not have any active website. I found this "something more" through the simplest of Google searches. gidonb (talk) 03:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. High schools are usually notable. We do check that they are not tiny or fake. This third-party source removes such concerns. gidonb (talk) 18:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless more sources are found. Note that there was a 2017 RfC which concluded that high schools are no longer presumed to be automatically notable, see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. We still need multiple independent sources providing substantive coverage of the school. The source provided by Gidonb is something, but it is not enough. I did a bit of google searching myself but could not find anything else of substance, mostly some facebook pages, some directory listings and trivial mentions. If somebody can produce additional sources, I'd be glad to revise my opinion. As it is, the subject currently does not pass WP:GNG. Nsk92 (talk) 13:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Nsk92, correct. They dropped their website and now use Facebook instead as their official page. How about using this official page plus the third-party source that I found? My concern is that we are systematically discriminating against large schools in Africa because there is less online media. gidonb (talk) 09:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence that it meets WP:NORG (t &#183; c)  buidhe  23:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth.  // Timothy ::  talk  01:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.