Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitsch Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Artist-run space. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Kitsch Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I cannot find significant coverage for this gallery.  — fetch ·  comms   20:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like an advertisement. Doc Quintana (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete did not find significant independent coverage enough to meet GNG in my mind. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - inadequate coverage in secondary sources to establish notability. VQuakr (talk) 05:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Artist-run_space, where I've already merged material. There are not enough sources (as yet) to validate an independent article, but per WP:NNC there is verification to substantiate inclusion in a general survey article.  Ty  07:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with Tyrenius that Kitsch Gallery belongs in the general survey article, not an independent article. The independent article should be deleted. Warrenking (talk) 21:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * When material is merged from one article to another, the original is left as a redirect to preserve GFDL. Also it makes the encyclopedia more useful to readers as anyone searching for the Kitsch Gallery will get redirected straight to the relevant section about it.  Ty  00:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect I agree with Tyrenius.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect, or merge - encyclopedic as another artist-run space do not delete...Modernist (talk) 02:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.