Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitten (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. Sandstein 05:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Kitten (porn star)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable, no real sources, fails WP:PORNBIO. Natalie 04:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -Panser Born-   (talk)  11:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. Tabercil 19:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep She passes WP:PORNBIO by appearing in the mainstream media when she was on Blind Date. Epbr123 20:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A TV appearance does not confer notability, and if WP:PORNBIO provides such an easy route to notability it needs fixing. Edison 23:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per failure of WP:PORNBIO. I do not feel that a single appearance on a reality tv show makes the cut for criteria #5. And while I admire deep-throating and moaning as much as the next guy, her penchant for it doesn't quite meet #2 either. Tarc 03:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for meeting WP:PORNBIO. Appearing in over 200 movies in any genre shows endurance in the business. Vegaswikian 22:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Did you happen to notice that "number of films" was listed under the "Invalid Criteria" header? Tarc 02:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep highly visible and notable porn slut... nuff said.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 06:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.