Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittendo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 02:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Kittendo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Kittendo does not exist, and does not need an article. --Xnuala (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * YES IT DOES> I already lknow it doesn't exist. If someone searches for it, they can get redirected to one or both of the games. It helps the companies too for sales ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toa Mario (talk • contribs) 18:22, 8 April 2007
 * We are not an advertising medium. --Dennisthe2 20:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and there is no need for a disambiguation page for something that does not exist ... this article is a mirror of Nintencats by the same author (who keeps removing PROD abd DB tags), and it should also be deleted ... see Talk:Nintencats. &mdash; 18:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - The only place this game exists is in internet forums. "Wouldn't it be cool if they made a cat version of nintedogs?" Let it remain at that. Dr bab 18:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC).


 * KEEP- you idiots need to read. I KNOW IT DOESNT EXIST. WHAT IF OTHER PEOPLE DONT?` IF SOMEONE SEARCHES FOR IT THEY CAN BE DREDIRECTED TO ONE OR BOTH OF THOISE PAGES. Toa Mario 19:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Lay off the personal attacks, and do not call us idiots. Just don't. --Dennisthe2 20:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I am certain that starting to insult everyone is not going to help your case. Please be civil. Dr bab 20:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC).


 * Delete - No assertion of notability in the article. This article reads like a non-subject. I'm toying with the idea of afd-ing Nintencats. It would have been nice if the two had been lumped together in one nom. -- Ben 19:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I originally was going to AFD Nintencats, but noticed that it had already been AFD'd so I db-reposted it. --Xnuala (talk) 19:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The author,, keeps removing the CSD tag from that article ... I think it's time to get an admin involved for a time-out. --68.239.79.97 19:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. I think you can go ahead with the db-repost if you think it's the right thing. -- Ben 23:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * FYI, Toa Mario is currently blocked for one week after disruptive editing and suspected sockpuppetry in a content dispute on Collis Potter Huntington. Slambo (Speak) 21:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as crystalballery. --Dennisthe2 20:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - an encyclopedia does not list things which do not exist without extremely good reason. --Haemo 20:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Dude, look at Cat. They, after all, are evidence that there are things in nature that have no purpose. =^_^= --Dennisthe2 20:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both as per discussion above. DES (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both per all above. A le_Jrb talk  21:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Additional nom
I am adding Nintencats to this nomination, as it is an exact duplicate of the current page under another title. It is not subject to speedy as a recreation, because it is not substantially similar to the previously deleted article. DES (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't we give the article its own AfD? I mean, we're already well into this one. --Dennisthe2 20:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I am unsure about the correct WP policy, but it makes perfect sense to take these two as one, as they are basically the same thing: Fan-created name suggestions for a computer game that might be released at some point. Dr bab 20:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Concur &mdash; Identical text, same author ... same comments would apply to both ... better kept in one place. --68.239.79.97 20:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The additional nom was added in less than 2 hours after the start of this AfD, and AfDs normally run for 5 days. And the 2nd article had been mentioned in this AfD even earlier. Furthermore, the two articles are identical, and ought to be discussed together. I'll notify those who commented earleir -- the article's creator haas already been notifed. DES (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well put, I'll defer to that. --Dennisthe2 22:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete both. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and both article lack sources. Their purpose is to "helps the companies too for sales" per their author. Wikipedia is not a forum for promoting commercial interests. Gwernol 00:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll do some db-spam tags. Can you salt the pages? --Dennisthe2 00:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is NOT "blatent advertising" nor do i see how it fits any of the WP:CSD. db-spam tag removed. This is pretty clearly going to get deleted on AfD, no reason for an invalid speedy (which i would reverse and take to WP:DRV). DES (talk) 02:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A1 and G11 Rackabello 06:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete. . Mukadderat 17:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion seems in order here. The author himself (who, incidentally, has been banned) has admitted that the games do not exist and that he is trying to "help the companies for sales." Tozoku 01:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.