Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitziggle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete clear consensus.--Jersey Devil (talk) 06:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Kitziggle

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No references support the notability of this to be released book. No ghits. Possibly a hoax. Speedy declined. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No article exists for the author, and I couldn't find any coverage on the book. Even if it isn't a hoax, it fails WP:BK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtyq2 (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Rtyq2 (talk) 00:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as the speedy decliner. Jclemens (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per talkpage, no google evidence that either the book author or the book exists/will exist. – sgeureka t•c 00:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * An IP with conflicts of interest just admitted that the book author "has just begun his career". – sgeureka t•c 00:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable.  Xihr  01:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 00:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY DELETE as disruptive vandalism. I've lost track how many hoaxes we've hosted here on Wikipedia now, its way past the 100 mark.  :-(  JBsupreme (talk) 08:50, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.