Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiul-Barauni Section


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Kiul-Barauni Section

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not satisfy WP:NPLACE. No WP:SIGCOV about it and the given sources do not demonstrate notability. – Meena • 21:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and India. – Meena • 21:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems to be WP:OR "line" created from portions of the Howrah–Delhi main line and Mokama–Barauni section. I can't find any description from the sources in article that describes the Kiul-Barauni section as a separate "line". Jumpytoo Talk 02:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bihar-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:17, 2 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable at this moment. Raymond3023 (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails our notability guidelines. I also share the concerns that this article is OR. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Let's clarify what we're talking about here. I disagree that our notability guidelines are relevant here. A railway line as a piece of physical infrastructure is presumptively notable. It's just not possible that sufficient sourcing doesn't exist. It may be offline, or in another language, but it exists. I think it's a far more persuasive point from that this article is, as it stands, original research and a conflating of two other topics. Deletion is an appropriate outcome absent sourcing that clarifies this point. If and when sources are brought forward we may want to revisit that. Mackensen (talk) 13:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.