Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KiwiLyrics (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 12:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

KiwiLyrics
Delete - Prod'd, but has already survived an AFD. UtherSRG (talk) 14:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Link to old deletion discussion page is broken, not sure how this ever survived an AfD, and can't find out! In any case, delete as non-notable website. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seraphimblade (talk • contribs) 14:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I've linked the previous afd above; it was typo'd on the article's talk page. Of the two keep votes (omission of ! deliberate) there, one is a classic WP:ILIKEIT from a user of the site, claiming that it was "fast-growing" (i.e., not yet notable, but someday it may be!) and that it's "heavily linked" (though it should not be linked to from Wikipedia at all, as we should not link to copyright infringements).  As for the other, I'd repeat Uncle G's mantra that counting google hits isn't research, but this vote didn't even bother to count them.  Of the 98 unique results that Google found for kiwilyrics, I didn't notice a single one from a reliable source.  Plenty of forum posts, blogs, and SEO, though. Were it not for the previous afd, the article as it currently stands would be a clear WP:CSD candidate, as it makes no assertion of any sort of notability.  Nor does it cite any third-party sources.  There isn't even any primary source linked for any of the article except for the digression in the third paragraph.  With the site gone, and nothing promising showing up on google (did I miss something at all usable?), the article is and seems likely to stay unverifiable.  Certainly it doesn't meet WP:WEB.  Delete. &mdash;Cryptic 15:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Cryptic. -- Charlene 17:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator the first time around. Punkmorten 22:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as prodder. HawkerTyphoon 22:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.