Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiwi Radio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 15:02, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Kiwi Radio

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

another non-notable pirate radio station; totally unsourced Rapido (talk) 11:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 18:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: If this article is deleted, care must be taken to move Kiwi Radio (disambiguation) to this name and to unwind a significant number of existing links. - Dravecky (talk) 06:52, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has significant coverage in these books. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - the second book does NOT have significant coverage - it only mentions Kiwi Radio in one sentence. Currently fails WP:N, significant coverage in independent sources, Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention. Rapido (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. If you click "view all" from that Google Books link you can see that there is further coverage of the station on another page. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I had a look and there are more mentions, contrary to my above comment. But not necessarily more "coverage" - the other mentions seem to be little more than loggings and statistics. Rapido (talk) 11:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 21:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per significant sources found by Phil Bridger above. -- Cycl o pia talk  00:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.