Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiyan Isfahan FSC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete and redirect to Iran Futsal's 2nd Division. Consensus to delete following three renominations. Redirected following deletion. The Bushranger One ping only 23:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Kiyan Isfahan FSC

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Notability. ● Mehran Debate● 11:40, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete doesn't appear notable but can the nominator please give us some more information regarding why they nominated this article "Notability" isn't enough as we aren't psycic mediums Seasider91 (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, Sorry about that I was a little lazy to write more. ● Mehran Debate● 15:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. ● Mehran  Debate● 15:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 18:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Query: Is Iran Futsal's 2nd Division considered a fully professional league? - The Bushranger One ping only 18:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * From my quick check I think it's only the super league that is professional, I think we should put the rest of the clubs in the 2nd division with a wikipedia page into one nomination as I don't believe they are notable. Seasider91 (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:18, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Mentoz86 (talk) 22:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - whether or not a league is fully pro is only important when it comes to players notability. Speaking of clubs, we don't have a real guideline, only the essay WP:FOOTYN, and a consensus that everything must pass WP:GNG. Mentoz86 (talk) 22:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: Looking at the club's league and the clubs within the league I think that this is a nation-wide league so technically it does pass what I call Part 1 of WP:NFOOTY but sadly it fails Part 2 which is WP:GNG. Needs both to be notable. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability; could redirect to Iran Futsal's 2nd Division. GiantSnowman 10:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.