Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kizmeet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Kizmeet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article is a bare stub and has no possibility to expand. Plus, the website was closed as of today and the site redirects to Christian Mingle.com. If anything, this should be deleted as it is not notable and doesn't stand out from your average dating website. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 18:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Other than a few articles that mentioned the site launching, there's no other reliable coverage for this site- not even an article stating that the site closed., , . This site doesn't meet notability guidelines per WP:WEB.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * I got an email saying the site was closed, so that is how I knew that it did. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 01:27, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It's ok- I was pretty much saying that if the company didn't even get a "look who's closing" type of news article then it's genuinely not notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk)tokyogirl79
 * Ah, that makes sense. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 15:40, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete largely per Tokogirl79. The subject received a bit of coverage in reliable third party sources at its initial launch. However, it lacks a significant amount of coverage needed to establish the subject's notability. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  16:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.