Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kjell (letter)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Typisk norsk. Kurykh (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Kjell (letter)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Forgotten, one-time gimmick on a tv show. Geschichte (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for making the AfD. As creator, naturally I think we ought to keep this; the letter has continued to be discussed (in Norwegian), though not used. If it is deleted, hopefully the information could be saved through a merger into the relevant section in Typisk norsk. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 00:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 02:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge and redirect per User:Metaknowledge. I cannot find any reliable English sources (scholar, books, news), and for the cited source I have to AGF (no google preview). With only one source, it doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. If more sources could be provided (perhaps by a Norwegian speaker), I would be happy to reconsider, but one book mention, likely in passing, doesn't establish notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Merge as per - interesting tidbit, but not enough for a standalone article.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.