Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kk (duo)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as a Hoax.  BLACK KITE  01:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Kk (duo)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Strongly suspect this is a hoax -- no record found at Billboard of any such album or group Accounting4Taste: talk 22:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following page, a fake album by this fake group:
 * Accounting4Taste: talk 23:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I was starting to think I was going crazy. The article LOOKS real but nothing about it checks out... then I noticed that someone had admonished the creator for creating hoax pages before.  Maybe I am crazy... but I can't find any reference at all to this musical act.  Note to closing admin: there is a (possibly fake) album article associated with this page. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: Food (Duo album) should be added to this AfD.  Corvus cornix  talk  22:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The creator seems to be creating a walled garden of interconnected hoax pages; I noticed the first one but until I was sure they were all a hoax, I didn't want to go forward. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete nominated for speedy deletion as a hoax {vandalism). Mh29255 (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have removed the speedy as hoaxes are specifically not speediable.--Fabrictramp (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Understand. However, the article is likely a WP:HOAX. Mh29255 (talk) 23:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete both. Gsearch isn't turning anything up, which would be unusual for a recent hit group.--Fabrictramp (talk) 23:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both. I would add that the user should also be indef blocked, but it's easier to monitor their current account. Cool Hand Luke 23:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I blocked him for 24 hours just to stop the onslaught of hoax pages while I (and other administrators and users, for whose help I'm grateful) sort this out. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Both. Hoax.   Happy New Year!!  Malinaccier (talk) 23:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.