Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kkkop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:NOTDIC. Reliable sources do not show this as an actual term. Nakon 00:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Kkkop

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOTDIC Transcendence (talk) 17:31, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't delete, it's clearly a derogatory term that is in use. There are references to its usage. Why is this even a debate? UnifiedLeftOnTwitter (talk) 17:44, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The only sources in this article that actually use the term are from blogs that are no reliable sources. Transcendence (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - IamM1rv (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * don't Delete Article has been expanded and became more encyclopedic, please review changes and expansions. Hopefully nobody is basing their decision on whether or not they like the term or its context.UnifiedLeftOnTwitter (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Kkkop is not an argument only on police brutality as the numerous references point out, it is a criticism whether real or imagined of the similarities between police and the kkk. I hope that personal politics aren't getting in the way of objectivity.UnifiedLeftOnTwitter (talk) 19:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Article title is a neologism, if you look at the Catagory "Category:Criticism of police brutality" we see this is the problem when we have a catagory with no main article. Instead of having "Criticism of Police brutality" why not just write an article Police Brutality. Bryce Carmony (talk) 18:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * delete just a dictionary definition.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 18:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If there is verifiable sources then write a section in Police about comparisons to the KKK. Bryce Carmony (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It is ironic that someone with the username UnifiedLeftOnTwitter is concerned about keeping politics out. Transcendence (talk) 18:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

−	Btw, I'm no expert entry writer, so I ask that you allow this article time to be expanded by people who are more knowledgeable in Wikipedia and don't rush to judgement. There are numerous references to this phrase and a historic context in which the idea of kkkop differs and reveals a point of view held by many people that exists outside of a criticism of police brutality. I hope that you will read at least a few of the references and give other, more knowledgeable people time to improve this poorly written entry.UnifiedLeftOnTwitter (talk) 19:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * If it's deleted you can ask for it to be userfied. This just means it is moved out of main space to your space to work on. Links from other articles are removed so readers can't normally find it, but you can keep working on it and you can ask other editors to review it or for help.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 19:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.