Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaiber's law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Klaiber's law

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG. I have been unable to find copies of the linked sources (which, regardless, don't appear to be widely cited or in reputable outlets), and a quoted Google search for "Klaiber's law" returns only the Wikipedia page and other pages scrapied from it. 2dot718 (talk) 00:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 2dot718 (talk) 00:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. 2dot718 (talk) 00:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. If this were a common term, I'd expect to see far more mentions of it. Owen&times; &#9742;  20:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.