Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klarisse de Guzman (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Klarisse de Guzman
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

I did a WP:BEFORE search and didn't see anything significant that came after the last (very sparsely attended) AfD in my search or in the article. There may be enough for an article on "Brit Queens" but I didn't run that down too deeply. Hobit (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Hobit (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Hobit (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I added the awards and nomination section to the article.Sbhpiamonte (talk) 01:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Wading through a mass of relatively trivial sources did not fill me with any suggestion that this might be notable. Produced almost exclusively by a SPA editor, and an AfD for an earlier version of an article about the same subject, were all contraindications. The sources do not establish notability. Searches found nothing more - the author appears to have been most assiduous in scraping up every passing mention. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk  16:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - not nearly enough to pass WP:GNG, nothing significant since last AfD.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep or redirect. There is an abundance of ongoing coverage, include in the last week. No reason to delete the redirect or history preserved from AfD. It will take time to examine the coverage to see if it is all too trivial for a standalone article. Plausibly notable for more than one thing, so BIO1E is not an easy answer. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, redirect would make sense. And that was the status quo.  Self-trout for not suggesting that. Hobit (talk) 22:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes more than one criterion based on WP:GNG, namely - released two or more albums on a major record labels, won or been nominated for a major music award, won first, second or third place in a major music competition, sang a theme for a network television show. Espiem 75 (talk) 03:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have been invited here by . I have no real views on the matter. Most sources are poor and GNG is questionable. I'm inclined to suggest the redirect should be restored. GiantSnowman 09:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - But the article must undergo a cleanup first. Jayjay2020 (talk) 03:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as this piece in The Manilla Times as well as passing a number of the criteria of WP:NMUSIC such as releasing albums on a major label, came second in a notable music competition and sang the main theme tune of a notable television series, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The actress might have many projects to do at ABS-CBN so it needs the article to be updated for additional information. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it is best to keep the article, due to having reliable sources and information. However, the article must be updated for further reliable information regarding the singer's events and/or activities with ABS-CBN. Haveyouseenthisboy (talk) 07:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article needs some clean-up by removing anything WP:FANCRUFT. Other than that, per reasons above, it's good enough to pass WP:SINGER. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe it is best to keep the article, only provide more reliable sources to support the information provided in this article.Troy26Castillo (talk) 04:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep article meets GNG and artist seems to be very active in the local music industry as per continuing coverage.--RioHondo (talk) 06:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - article/subject notable, just needs clean-up on sources and C/Es to rid of fancruft/puffery Itssheenabautista (talk) 12:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.