Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Klik

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was prodded as promotional. I don't necessarily disagree, but it has been here for many years, the overall company is notable, merge is therefore a possibility, s rewrite might  also be an option  but I don't understand the subject well enough to do it, so I think we should get a community consensus on what to do about.  DGG ( talk ) 01:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep Clickteam is a old games software company that easily satisfies WP:ORG with a article that describes their primary software product. There is a very active community around this product, for example []. Also Google books has several books describing the phenomenon of Klik. The article itself is really shabby, and seems to be largely created by anonymous editors, but that is no reason to delete it. A good cleanup and removal of any advertisement with addition of available references will do WP some good. scope_creep (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep, as per the above. --Yellow1996 (talk) 23:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep (or merge with Clickteam). When I created this article back in 2004 it was not for promotion of the products but because I thought that it was a notable topic worthy of an article. It was one of my first Wikipedia articles and adapted from a report I had written for College, and as such the content may need improvement. I think it remains a topic worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia and that it should be improved rather than deleted. For example, the current list of 'well known' games does not provide sufficient background information such as the product used and how it is notable. However, if others feel that Klik does not merit its own article then I would suggest that at least some of the content is merged into the article on Clickteam. --Joshtek (talk) 19:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.