Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klomentum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. This "merge" close was actually carried out by but since "archive" templates don't work properly here I am doing a formal close too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Klomentum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable neologism. No significant, in-depth coverage of the phrase itself. We already have Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign, where this neologism is already mentioned. Neutralitytalk 20:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC) Neutralitytalk 20:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 20:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. I added a notability tag after the article was created and was planning on a merge proposal when I had the time. It's relevant to her campaign for president which is why the term even exists so it should be merged to there. It isn't relevant enough in general to warrant its own article. ––Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs)  21:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. While this term has gained some popularity related to Klobuchar's campaign, it does not merit its own entry, any more than Obama's "Yes We Can" merits one (that article is presently a redirect to the article about his 2008 campaign). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. Almy (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. A media catchphrase should be mentioned in the context of the campaign, but isn't suitable for a stand-alone article; it's extremely unlikely it will ever be used except to refer to her campaign. Per WP:NEO, I think the current coverage clearly uses the term, rather than is about the term.  Schazjmd   (talk)  22:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Selective merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. Hog Farm (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign - Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign- It seems to already get a mention in the main article. If there is anything notable in this article that isn't in the main article then it should be merged. The term is only notable as it pertains to the 2020 Klobuchar campaign. The fact that the campaign and the media can't even agree on a single term Klobusurge/Klobucharge/Klobmentum/Klomentum is probably a good indication that the term itself doesn't meet WP:NEO as it is just used as a term to describe her "momentum" in the race. Aaron Booth (talk) 01:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign - Not every catchphrase needs an article, and this one is no exception. C. Pineda (クリス) (talk) 04:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. This is just a catchphrase, not a topic of its own. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign per above and close per WP:SNOW. This article was rather irresponsibly cited by The New York Times which hastens the importance of WP:DEADLINENOW. Sdkb (talk) 06:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. It's a catchphrase. If Klobuchar ends up winning the nomination or the general election, then I can see this warranting its own article, but as of right now, there is nothing here that warrants its own article. --Steelers3814 (talk) 12:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge: even if Klobuchar wins the nomination, there is nothing notable to say about the term itself. Any information here would be better placed in the campaign article because Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign is a more accurate title than Klomentum.— Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 22:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. Typical WP:RECENTISM over the smallest shreds of churnalism What's next, Klomentum in March 2019? February 10, 2020 Amy Klobuchar CBS interview?? News agencies are desperate for readers so they churn out daily drivel and incestuously report on each other's content (or list reaction of random Twitter users) to fulfill their click-bait quota. Wikipedia articles should always be more restrained.  --Animalparty! (talk) 03:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. This is a short lived catchphrase centered around a single Democratic primary; it does not have sufficient weight as a phrase to justify its own article. NomadicNom (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. A nonce word that will become irrelevant as soon as the next primary happens. Dylanvt (talk) 20:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. Pretty obvious, really. -- Scjessey (talk) 17:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. An standalone "about" piece regarding a nickname to a phenomena is unnecessary. Bryan (talk) 03:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge, Per above, merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign, Alex-h (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign per above. Tvc 15 (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge selectively as suggested. FWIW, I have supported her campaign. Bearian (talk) 14:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I have merged the references that seemed most relevant into one paragraph in Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. At this point I think this page can be replaced w/ a redirect to that section.  – SJ +  07:19, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.