Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knaggs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep as a disambiguation page; User:Cnilep has taken care of doing that. Mandsford 13:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Knaggs

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant secondary source coverage established in article, and no apparent significant mention in any other sources. Seems to fail WP:GNG.
 * Comment The article survived a previous call for deletion some 6.5 years ago. Certainly it doesn't pass WP:RS.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 20:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Convert to dab page Mjroots (talk) 21:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * keep This was discussed for deletion back in 2004 - and passed. Jeff Knaggs (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment More accurately, it was closed as "no consensus". Consensus can change over 6 years.     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 09:21, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 11:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant    talk    16:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep but convert to a Surname DAB, as suggested by Mjroots. Cnilep (talk) 17:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * See Articles for deletion/Knaggs (2nd nomination) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I closed that discussion page and left a link to here, luckily there were no comments on that page anyway. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep but convert into a DAB page as suggested by Mjroots. --MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have converted the page to a DAB. That appears to be the drift of this discussion, but of course I am biased, having recommended such action myself. Cnilep (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.