Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knee baby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:37, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Knee baby

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a neologism or dictionary entry, not notable not referenced. Yotemordis (talk) 23:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually it was referenced when you nominated it but that page suggets that this is in fact a dictionary definition of only very limited regional importance. Move to Wiktionary and delete. De728631 (talk) 01:17, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Yotemordis has been blocked as a sockpuppet but I think we should nevertheless continue this deletion discussion. De728631 (talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary or redirect to birth order. I don't see how this can be expanded or rescued right now.  The word is admittedly a slang term in a regional dialect.  There is no evidence that it has any cultural significance beyond the title of a novel and one magazine article.  I am hesitent to completely delete this, because it is a valid search term if anything, and even more so, someone could in theory create a whole article about it later on in the future. By the way, even a broken watch tells the correct time twice a day; even a banned user could have done some good. Bearian (talk) 13:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and send to Wiktionary, as per explained rationale. It does seem like slang that does not have an established reason for notability here. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 05:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. There is no point in a redirect to birth order or elsewhere unless it is added to the target. Appears to be solely a regional term. TerriersFan (talk) 23:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.