Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kneippen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Kneippen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem notable enough. StaticGull Talk  17:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep verifiable inhabited places are notable. Here are sources to prove it:. Stubs are articles that need expansion; not deletion. Cheers, EJF (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.   —EJF (talk) 22:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per EJF and populations centers are inherently notable. --Oakshade (talk) 00:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: if "borough" means some sort of governmental entity, it's surely notable simply by being that; and if it's simply a neighborhood, it's notable by being a populated community. Nyttend (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.