Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knewton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 23:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Knewton

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This organization is non-notable and the entry reads like an advertisement. Yoshimoto2 (talk) 19:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Keep. The organization is notable; they have been written up on TechCrunch and have attracted strong investments. Yoshimoto2 has no history. Outside best practices. Keep this site clean!

Keep Pretty obvious that even if it requires a rewrite, is potentially useful to Wikipedia. It is also pretty notable("$2.5 million in investment capital from Accel Partners, Reid Hoffman, Ron Conway, and Josh Kopelman at First Round Capital." with a good reference), and does not have the advertisement tone. Cheers.  Im per a t § r (Talk)  22:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article has 5 independent sources, most of which seem to be reliable. Doesn't look like an advert to me.  See no reason to delete. JulesH (talk) 08:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Keep - Company is backed by well-known investors, was written up at length on TechCrunch in an article that was republished on washingtonpost.com, and was chosen by Amazon.com as a finalist in their startup competition. Young company but clearly notable with solid references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UnnotableWorldFigure (talk • contribs) 03:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - needs some work but appears to be notable enough. There have been a bunch of new articles on test prep companies and this is the first one I've seen that has reasonable references.--Rtphokie (talk) 13:41, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.