Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knight Protectors of the Great Kingdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Knight Protectors of the Great Kingdom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional chivalric order. No evidence of real-world notability; article has been tagged as being written in an in-universe style for over a decade. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable fictional organization. Searching for sources brings up nothing in reliable, secondary sources, meaning it fails the WP:GNG.  There is only in-universe plot information here, that is only sourced to primary sources, so there is nothing here that needs to be merged or preserved.  Rorshacma (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking independent coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG and belongs on Wikia. ~ riley  ( talk  ) 00:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.