Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knights, Fighters, and Men-at-Arms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Grenadier Models. Spartaz Humbug! 07:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Knights, Fighters, and Men-at-Arms

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is just one of many mor eor less similar articles, about gaming products which got a usually very short review in Space Gamer in the 1980s, and now have an article solely based on this. This specific product doesn't get attention in any other reliable sources available online, online some Pinterest pages, a few shops selling these, and some scanned catalogues from the company that made these.

Perhaps some general discussion is needed to see what to do with things like Traveller Supplement 11: Library Data (N-Z) or Personalities (Ral Partha), most of them will need to be redirected or deleted probably, but for now let's focus on this one article only, which seems to lack all notability. Fram (talk) 09:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to Fantasy Lords. BOZ (talk) 12:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: I have added Traveller Figures: Adventurers and Alien Mercenaries to this nomination, two other sets of figures from the same company with only an extremely similar source as well. Fram (talk) 15:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * One more: Imperial Marines. Fram (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * One more set of figurines, Soldiers of Fortune (Traveller), and a set of dice for crying out loud, Traveller Dice. Terrible. Fram (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: Those can all be merged into Grenadier Models rather than deleted. BOZ (talk) 15:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect all to Grenadier Models. A merge can be performed as well if people think its necessary, but the target article is a pretty big mess itself, so it would probably need some cleanup before any additional information could be merged to it in a practical way.  169.232.162.112 (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete All clearly fail WP:GNG and I question the usefulness of a redirect. SportingFlyer  T · C  07:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  13:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.