Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knismolagnia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Consensual tickling as an WP:ATD Salvio giuliano 17:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Knismolagnia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This virtually content-free single-sourced stub has been redirected and re-created a number of times, the author contending that it goes beyond a WP:DICDEF (which in my view it most certainly does not) and should not be a redirect to Consensual tickling. In a two-paragraph article, we are told "It seems to be a relatively common interest on the internet", which is about as WP:OR as you'll get, and "The total number of people who have knismolagnia is unknown and there aren't very many straightforward estimates." which equally adds zilch to the sum total of human knowledge. The image was apparently uploaded under a CC license, but there appears to be little evidence of that. In total, we have an article that lacks the stuff of WP:GNG, that should at best be a redirect but which its author, in its current iteration, does not accept should be a redirect. Delete and include mention of the term under Consensual tickling, redirect to Consensual tickling or any suggestion of a better redirect target gratefully received. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Behavioural science,  and Psychology. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no reason for standalone page for a Greek-derived term of something that is already covered elsewhere. The title of this article should be included in Consensual tickling (which it is) and that's as much as can be salvaged from here, since everything else is repetition.  Ppt91    talk   18:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect: Our Wiktionary article on this states: "Mainly encountered in word lists rather than actual use," which tracks with what I've found. The author is at best a WP:SPA. Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect as an ATD to Consensual tickling, where anyone with an interest can add cited information about this term. Definitely not notable enough for a standalone article. Onel 5969  TT me 12:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.