Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowlarity Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. On the basis of the added references from Melanie.  DGG ( talk ) 02:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Knowlarity Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Advertising for non-notable company, fails WP:CORP. Prod removed with no reason given. Kimchi.sg (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2010 (UTC) Comment This organization, Knowlarity Communications, is helping the Indian government track a meal scheme served at schools for the Indian children (below poverty line) which is quite a big step in social responsibility from a corporate. More information can be found on the internet using search engines and using the key words 'Knowlarity" and "Mid Day Meal" . I could find 15 articles from various news sources.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, almost meaningless spam: cloud communications platform, is used by governments and corporates to develop large scale management information systems (MIS) using mobile telephony to accumulate and disseminate information. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable company - the "headquartered in Pittsburgh, USA" claim appears to be bogus. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC) (strike my opinion - now that the article has been updated, I'll have to re-evaluate it, which I'll do as soon as I have some time -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC))
 * Articles from news sources are exactly what we need to establish notability (as per WP:N) - if you'd care to find them and add them to the article, I'd certainly be happy to reconsider my opinion. Best regards -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Further Comment This article has been updated and improvised as per feedbacks given on this page from Boing! said Zebedee & EnabledDanger. Legitimate sources has been referred to. Please let me know if it suffices. Knowourba (talk) 11:13, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. No reliable sources cited.  If there are any, please add them and I will gladly change my vote to keep.  EnabledDanger (talk) 20:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete There are 5 links given each pointing to reliable and credible sources like NDTV, AOL, Digit and Business Standard (one of the largest national dailies in the country). Knowlarity Communications is a company which is promoting eco-friendliness and green IT by starting something like e-fax in india. Also, being a startup it should be commended for also concentrating on corporate social responsibility for eg the UP govt mid day meal scheme for which it has become famous for in the country. I think it satisfies all the wiki criteria for it not to be deleted. Just to give an idea of the credibility of the sources - Indian Express has a readership of about 1.8 million people across the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.180.97.198 (talk) 05:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the sources provided demonstrate notability. They include articles (not just mentions, but actual articles ABOUT the company or its technology) from the Economic Times of India and the Indian Express  and others. Two of the references are to the same article, and the Business Standard item looked like it might be a press release, but I think the ones I cited here are sufficient. --MelanieN (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. References provided do seem to include reliable mainstream sources writing specifically about the company, so I think notability has been established. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, there are enough sources now to establish notability. --Nuujinn (talk) 00:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.