Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge Codes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. TexasAndroid (talk) 17:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Knowledge Codes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-sensical. Please note connection to article Knowledge Based/Knowledge Acquisition, which is authored by same user (user Richardlord50), and likewise nominated for deletion (here). Neither article has hope in my view. BCST2001 (talk) 16:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete; the article acknowledges that it's a neologism with no showing of notability: a newly formed neologism concept,its central ideas are this:That a society constructs its scientific knowledge on the basis of its knowledge gathering, it can then be studied (knowledge assimilation) and it is this gathering of knowledge which can also reveal its(society) knowledge codes and in turn can reveal its power strucure and how,that or,societys work (see) Knowledge Based/Knowledge Acquisition . If that's an "idea", I'm Catherine the Great. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO and WP:V. Basement12 (T.C) 17:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: this is an unverified neologism. Cliff smith  talk  17:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above reasons, violates WP:NEO and definitely has WP:V problems.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs  09:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as patent nonsense (G1) WikiScrubber (talk) 13:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.