Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge normalization

'NOTE: Originally listed here on August 18 and not delete despite overwhelming consensus. Additionally, I have moved this article to wikibooks:transwiki:Knowledge Normalization.' -- Davodd 11:16, Aug 24, 2004 (UTC)

Dump of a lengthy original essay. Not entirely coherent. I'm not sure it's a cohesive whole. User:Yardcock suggested on Talk:Knowledge normalization that it could be moved to Wikisource, but I'm not sure I'd even do that. The user who wrote this seems to have had most of his edits eventually reverted. 329 Google hits for "knowledge normalization", and the first ones are just copies of this article. &mdash;Triskaideka 22:46, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete it: Sheesh, all those copyright symbols (from HTML tags), and then "domains" and then "paradigm" and starting off with dictionary definitions...it's nearly a perfect template of the 7 habits of highly moronic essay writers.  An essay with no encyclopedic content. Geogre 00:58, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. It claims to introduce a new paradigm, hence labels itself as original "research". Josh Cherry 02:12, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. User is spamming this article all over the web, and it's just a collection of mostly meaningless marketing-speak. ··gracefool |&#9786; 03:26, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete; nonsense. DannyBoy | Talk 06:59, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - subject is real but in its infancy, not yet encyclopedic. - TB 09:46, Aug 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Falls under "no original research" clause, unless it's a copyvio. In either case, delete. Andris 09:53, Aug 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. The author's edit summary, a new paradigm in the discipline of engineering human knowledge, Knowledge Normalization., identifies it pretty clearly as original research. --Michael Snow 17:23, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research clearly, and a bit creepy to boot.  -Seth Mahoney 18:49, Aug 23, 2004 (UTC)