Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Known Food


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per G11. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 15:22, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Known Food

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable neologism. (declined PROD) Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 17:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment by nom: Actually, might be G11able, now that I look at the website, but I'll leave that for others to decide. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 18:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow delete: I'm not seeing it as promotional, but nevertheless, it's a non-notable neologism, and the lone source doesn't even mention it. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:22, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You've compared the creator's account name to the WWW domain name, yes? &#9786;  Uncle G (talk) 23:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I didn't notice that. Although, it seems to be more about the neologism than the site, since it appears to just source the site rather than advertise it. As I mentioned in my comment, the source doesn't mention the subject at all. However, I think I'll go ahead and make a report on UAA, since the username matches the name of a site that the user may be trying to advertise in his or her article. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:30, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotion, given the business of the author (who is blocked for spam username by Orange Mike). The Janice Ortbring referred to is the owner of the agency. I think this is part of the Michigan campaign the link goes to. Whether it's a neologism or promo, it doesn't belong here. Peridon (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * delete, non-notable neologism, unreferenced.TheLongTone (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTNEO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:06, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. This appears to be a non-notable neologism. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.