Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knox United SC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 18:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Knox United SC

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

None of the sources establish notability (WP:GNG). Couldn't find any online either. ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  01:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Australia. –––  GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  01:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Semi professional football club playing in Victoria. Plenty of sources must exist including in print media. Simione001 (talk) 23:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - Per Simione001. Definetlyu has offline sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * any evidence of such? ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  23:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: No evidence of notability, fails GNG and NORG. None of the sources in the article or found in BEFORE are WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. 05:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is listed in . Keep voters must locate sources that demonstrate the topic passes GNG. Speculative statements are not convincing arguments. We need to see the evidence.4meter4 (talk) 15:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.