Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knysna fine art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. This article was sent to AFD just a few hours after it was created and a lot of editing has occurred since the nomination which was the second edit to the article. I see a mix of Keeps and Deletes after 3 relistings which leaves me at No consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Knysna fine art

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of notability. My confidence in the sources is not enhanced by the fact that all of them are blocked by the library where I edit. TheLongTone (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Visual arts, Museums and libraries,  and South Africa.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The sources are accessible for me. Some are not independent, but I believe this contributes to N:ORG while this is not likely independent content. Weak keep as I imagine there's some offline sourcing. I'll look for it while this is at AfD. Star   Mississippi  13:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I have added the online sources where these are available DoubleTripleYou (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I submit that the subject of the article should be eligible for publication as the gallery in question is the largest of its kind in South Africa. I have added additional sources since first publication DoubleTripleYou (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is promotional, stating It is considered one of the top contemporary galleries in South Africa with a citation to a travel guide and no further information about why it might be considered important. Also states Read, who is considered one of the foremost authorities on contemporary South African art with citation to the gallery's site and a tour guide. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: looking at the sources as a whole, what doesn't fail WP:V fails WP:N. Not part of my consideration but notable to the discussion is the concerns about WP:PROMOTION.
 * microbiology Marcus (petri dish) 16:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.