Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koalisyon ng mga Pulitikong na Maka-Administrasyon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was d e lete. east. 718 at 20:43, 11/15/2007

Koalisyon ng mga Pulitikong na Maka-Administrasyon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This political party exists only in Wikipedia. For example: Coalition of the Administrative Political Parties Google search and Koalisyon ng mga Pulitikong na Maka-Administasyon Google search. This has been prodded once before and I thought I've AFD'd this already but it seems I haven't. -- Howard  the   Duck  12:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. No reliable sources in both languages.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment If this party does not exist then can someone check the election results we have on Philippine general election, 2007 because they show this party winning 3 seats and must be incorrect if this party exists only on wikipedia. Davewild 17:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * According to the official House roster, there is no CAPP, and the three CAPP "members" belong to the Liberal Party or their related parties/coalitions. -- Howard  the   Duck  17:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't verify this party. If Congress or the COMELEC itself doesn't recognize one such "CAPP" party, then no such organization exists, either on paper or as far as legal sources are concerned. --- Tito Pao 01:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Hmmm, so why is this party listed in the election article? --seav 06:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Beats me as well. It looks like it was CSD'ed but was later restored before it was AfD'ed, so I don't know who created this article and whoever placed it on the election article. I have some ideas on how this article was created, but I'll never know unless someone can show me the original history that was apparently deleted due to the CSD. If you can read my mind---I mean, if you can recall the issues we used to have on the election article---you know what I'm talking about ;-) --- Tito Pao 12:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.